Research On Parents Know-How of Vaccination In Children


Vaccination in kids has for long been an area of concern and challenge and it is indeed significant that parents be brought into the picture so that they be aware of their role in making sure of better versions that arise due to it.

The groundbreaking research paper “Assessment of Parents Knowledge, Attitude and Practice about Child Vaccination in Selected Rural Areas of Kalaburagi District, India” sheds light on crucial aspects of child vaccination. Led by author Rajeshwari Kumbar, the study delves deep into the levels of awareness, attitudes, and practices surrounding childhood immunization among local participants. Through a Prospective, Cross-Sectional study, over 600 parents from rural areas engaged in the analysis, with significant results pointing towards the positive impact of parental knowledge on increasing immunization rates among children.

The study’s findings underscore the importance of enhancing parental awareness to bolster vaccination coverage and mitigate the incidence of infectious diseases. By emphasizing the role of healthcare workers and advocating for community education initiatives, the research advocates for proactive measures to bridge the immunization gap in rural regions. These insights are pivotal in the ongoing efforts to improve public health outcomes and ensure the well-being of children across Kalaburagi District.

Pallav Dave review:

Pallav Dave’s expertise was very significant in identifying several weaknesses and strengths of the journal. The study exhibits several strengths, including a robust methodology involving a prospective, cross-sectional design that included many participants (631 parents) from selected rural areas. The statistical analysis conducted through SPSS software and Chi-Square tests added credibility to the findings. The study’s significant p-value (<0.01) indicates a strong statistical significance, enhancing the reliability of the results. Furthermore, the research sheds light on the importance of parental awareness in improving childhood immunization rates, providing valuable insights for public health interventions.

Despite its strengths, the research paper also presents some limitations. One area for improvement could be the relatively small sample size of parents who did not complete the study (20 parents), which might have affected the comprehensive analysis of vaccination practices. Additionally, the study’s reliance on self-reported data from parents regarding immunization status may pose a limitation in terms of accuracy and potential biases in responses. Self-reported data can sometimes be influenced by recall bias or social desirability bias, where participants might not accurately recall past events or may answer questions in a manner they perceive as more favorable. Addressing these weaknesses further strengthens the validity and reliability of the research findings. Future research could benefit from a larger and more diverse sample size and the incorporation of verified medical records to cross-check the self-reported data. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing immunization practices and help design more effective public health strategies.

Although the research paper talks about both strengths as well as limitations, but the overall assessment leads to the fact that immunization in kids and their parents know-how is a matter of concern but can also be a much easier way out so as to ensure that timely vaccination takes place wherever and whenever needed.

About the Author

Pallav Dave, a seasoned Regulatory Compliance Analyst based in Kentucky, was invited by the Journal of Drug Delivery and Therapeutics to review the research paper comprehensively. From his expertise in regulatory standards and research evaluation, Dave’s insightful feedback and meticulous analysis enriched the study’s overall quality and credibility. His dedication to upholding rigorous assessment criteria and ensuring scholarly integrity has significantly contributed to enhancing the paper’s robustness and relevance in the scientific community.