Close
Digital Health & Ai Innovation summit 2026
Medical Taiwan 2026

A New Approach to Managing GORD

Note* - All images used are for editorial and illustrative purposes only and may not originate from the original news provider or associated company.

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

โ€“ Access the Media PackNow

โ€“ Book a Conference Call

โ€“ Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Related stories

Indian study reveals a blend of...

A study by Indian nutraceutical major Meyer Vitabiotics has...

Study Finds Healthcare Providers Looking to...

A recent study published by management consulting firm CWH...

Collective & Collaborative Care Coordination

The Challenge Higher Standards is a fast-growing home health group...
Until now, assessing the progress of treatment for Gastro-Oesaphageal Refluxย  Disease (GORD) has relied primarily on an assessment of oesophageal healing. Documenting GORD therapy success is a difficult task, as mucosal damage doesย  not always correspond with the severity of symptoms.1 In addition, 70% of allย  patients with GORD symptoms have endoscopic-negative GORD.2,3

Until now, assessing the progress of treatment for Gastro-Oesaphageal Refluxย  Disease (GORD) hasย ย  relied primarily on an assessment of oesophageal healing.ย  Documenting GORD therapy success is aย  difficult task, as mucosal damage doesย  not always correspond with the severity of symptoms.1 In addition, 70% of allย  patients with GORD symptoms have endoscopic-negative GORD.2,3

To further complicate the GORD picture, Endoscopy-Negative Reflux Diseaseย  (ENRD), Non-Erosiveย ย ย  Reflux Disease (NERD), functional heartburn or reflux-likeย  dyspepsia is often diagnosed, and mostย ย ย  patients with heartburn do not haveย  mucosal breaks. Moreover, diagnostic approaches vary betweenย ย ย  primary andย  secondary care.

In the absence of gold standard diagnostic testing for GORD, symptom assessmentย  andย ย ย ย  understanding how symptoms impact on a patientโ€™s quality of life is critical toย  the successfulย ย ย ย  management of a patient. Recent research has suggested that theย  symptom complex experienced byย ย  GORD patients is much wider than previouslyย  appreciated.

Besides heartburn, acid eructation, and pain on swallowing, a variety of otherย  GORD-relatedย ย ย ย  symptoms are experienced, including nausea, diarrhoea orย  constipation and sleep disturbance, asย ย ย ย  well as other symptoms, such as respiratoryย  complaints. GORD is a condition of diverse and variableย ย ย ย  symptoms, many of whichย  significantly impair quality of life.

The problem for gastroenterologists trying to build a complete picture of a patientโ€™sย  symptoms is thatย ย ย ย  patients may find it difficult to describe accurately all theย  symptoms they are experiencing.ย ย ย ย  Consequently, they may not be treatedย  effectively. Even after successful acute treatment, the majority ofย ย ย ย  patients suffer aย  recurrence of symptoms within six months. And, if the non-classic signs of GORDย ย ย ย  are not seen, patients may be misdiagnosed. The broad spectrum of symptoms inย  GORD patientsย ย ย ย  and the high prevalence of endoscopy-negative GORD highlightย  the need for a robust, validatedย ย ย ย  approach to symptom assessment.

SIMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE

One such approach is ReQuestโ„ข, a simple and effective questionnaire, whichย  patients use to assessย ย ย ย  themselves daily for a wide range of GORD symptoms. Itย  was created following discussions withย ย ย ย  patients and physicians to identify theย  spectrum of symptoms reported and establish how they wereย ย ย ย  described by GORDย  patients. The questionnaire was also based on an evaluation of relevant medicalย ย ย ย  literature and clinical trial data.

ReQuest is divided into seven dimensions covering acid complaints, upperย  abdominal/stomachย ย ย ย  complaints, lower abdominal / digestive complaints, nausea,ย  sleep disturbances, general well-beingย ย ย ย  and other complaints. A short version of theย  questionnaire, which can be completed in less than fiveย ย ย ย  minutes, focuses solely onย  these seven dimensions, while the full version, which takes approximatelyย ย ย ย  20ย  minutes, is more wide-ranging.

Both tests have undergone extensive clinical trial evaluation and statistical analysis,ย  which hasย ย ย ย  confirmed their internal consistency, test-retest reliability, constructย  validity, and responsiveness toย ย ย ย  changes during treatment.4,5,6

ReQuest fulfils the criteria set by the regulatory authorities for a validatedย  symptom-based system forย ย ย ย  use as the primary outcome measure in clinical trials ofย  GORD therapy. It has now been validated inย ย ย ย  26 languages and tested in 20ย  countries.

REQUEST / LA CLASSIFICATION

The ReQuest / LA classification system is the first to effectively integrate a highlyย  sensitive patientย ย ย ย  questionnaire (ReQuest) with an adaptation of the LA classificationย  for esophagitis. The new indexย ย ย ย  allows the combined assessment of symptom reliefย  and the healing of oesophageal lesions inย ย ย ย  GORD.

The adapted LA classification (N = lesions not present, grade Aโ€“D) was pairedย  with a grading ofย ย ย ย  patientsโ€™ symptom burdens from 0โ€“4 (0 = no disease, 1 = minor,ย  2 = tolerable, 3 = troublesome, 4 =ย ย ย ย  intense), as assessed by the rescaled subscaleย  of the established GORD symptom evaluationย ย ย ย  instrument ReQuest.

By comparing both scales in a matrix, clinicians are able to quantify both aspects ofย  GORD and assignย ย ย ย  an index to each patient. An index of 0N indicates optimalย  treatment outcome, in other words completeย ย ย ย  remission (relief from symptoms andย  the healing of oesophageal lesions).

VALUABLE INSIGHTS

A recent randomised, double-blind study of 581 patients using ReQuest hasย  established thatย ย ย ย  pantoprazole is as effective as esomeprazole (both 40mg/day) overย  12 weeks in achieving theย ย ย ย  complete remission of erosive GORD. With respect toย  endoscopically confirmed healing, pantoprazoleย ย ย ย  was superior to esomeprazole.

A second randomised, double-blind ReQuest study, this time of four weeksโ€™ย  duration (561 patients),ย ย ย ย  again comparing pantoprazole and esomeprazole (bothย  40mg/day), demonstrated parity between theย ย ย ย  two PPIs in terms of symptom reliefย  scores, but it also showed that the beneficial effects ofย ย ย ย  pantoprazole were sustainedย  for longer, with significantly fewer symptomatic relapses in theย ย ย ย  seven- dayย  post- treatment phase.8

Professor K D Bardhan, consultant physician and gastroenterologist at the Districtย  General Hospital,ย ย ย ย  Rotherham, in the UK, who was instrumental in developing theย  ReQuest/ L A classification, says: โ€˜Weย ย ย ย  need a device that enables an accurateย  assessment of treatment success in GORD patients thatย ย ย ย  combines the mainย  parameters of symptom relief and oesophageal healing. The new ReQuest / LAย ย ย ย  classification enables a detailed clinical and treatment outcome assessment ofย  GORD patients at anyย ย ย ย  stage of their disease using a single and reliable globalย  measure. In my view, ReQuest / LAย ย ย ย  classification represents a helpful step in theย  right direction and provides a means of standardisingย ย ย ย  the assessment and reportingย  of GORD clinical trials.โ€™

An extensive ReQuest database, which provides information on patientย  demographics, symptomย ย ย ย  profiles and treatment outcomes, now exists for overย  8,000 patients with GORD. Use of the combinedย ย ย ย  endpointย  โ€˜complete remissionโ€™,ย  evaluated using the ReQuestโ„ข/LA classification, will permit evenย ย ย ย  greater insightsย  by helping to analyse patient populations and shed light on the factors that dictateย ย ย ย  whether a treatment works. Such a source of GORD treatment outcomes, duringย  various stages of theย ย ย ย  disease, could be of major benefit to patients, physicians andย  the organisations that fund healthcareย ย ย ย  in the future.

REFERENCES

1.ย ย ย ย ย  Dent J, Brun J, Fendrick AM, Fennerty MB, Janssens J, Kahrilas PJ, Lauritsen K, Reynolds JC, Shaw M, Talley NJ on behalf of the Genval Workshop Group. โ€˜An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management โ€“ the Geneval Workshop Reportโ€™. Gut 1999;44 (Suppl 2):1โ€“16
2.ย ย ย ย  Tack J, Fass R. โ€˜Review article: approaches to endoscopic-negative reflux disease: part of the GERD spectrum or a unique acid-related disorder?โ€™. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;19 (Suppl 1):28โ€“34
ย 3.ย ย ย ย  Martinez SD, Malagon IB, Garewal HS, Cui H, Fass R. โ€˜Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) โ€“ acid reflux and symptom patternsโ€™. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:537โ€“45
4.ย ย ย ย  Bardhan KD, Stanghellini V, Armstrong D, Berghรถfer P, Gatz G, Mรถnnikes H. โ€˜Evaluation of GERD symptoms during therapy. Part I. Development of the new GERD questionnaire ReQuestโ€™. Digestion 2004;69:229โ€“37
ย 5.ย ย ย ย  Mรถnnikes H, Bardhan KD, Stanghellini V, Berghรถfer P, Bethke TD, Armstrong D. โ€˜Evaluation of GERD symptoms during therapy. Part II. Psychometric evaluation and validation of the new questionnaire ReQuest in erosive GERDโ€™. Digestion 2004;69:238โ€“44
6.ย ย ย ย  Bardhan KD, Stanghellini V, Armstrong D, Berghรถfer P, Gatz G, Mรถnnikes H. โ€˜International validation of ReQuest in patients with endoscopy-negative gastro-esophageal reflux diseaseโ€™. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:891โ€“98
7.ย ย ย ย  Bardhan KD, Achim A, Ridderman T, Sander P, Pfaffenberger B. โ€˜Achieving complete remission in patients with erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): Pantoprazole is comparable with esomeprazoleโ€™. Gut 2005;53;(Suppl 7):A-106
8.ย ย ย ย  Glatzel D, Abdel-Qader M, Gatz G, Pfaffenberger B, Sander P.ย  โ€˜Pantoprazole 40mg is as effective as esomeprazole 40mg to relieve symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after four weeks of treatment and superior regarding preventing of symptomatic relapseโ€™. Gut 2005;54; (Suppl 7):A-105

COMPANY PROFILE

ALTANA Pharma is the pharmaceutical division of ALTANA AG. The companyย  concentrates on innovative pharmaceutical products in therapeutics, imagingย  (contrast media) and OTC medication. Therapeutics, the most important businessย  area, is based on prescription drugs for gastrointestinal and respiratory diseases.

Hospital & Healthcare Management brings together the global healthcare industry โ€” from hospital administrators and clinical directors to health technology innovators and policy leaders โ€” through trusted editorial, market intelligence, and digital engagement.

Our 2026 Media Pack offers integrated solutions to reach your audience:

  • Magazine & Digital Editions Showcase your brand within premium healthcare industry coverage read by executives and decision - makers worldwide.
  • Industry Insights & Reports Align with data - driven analysis, trend reports, and regional roundups across the global hospital and healthcare management value chain.
  • Brand Authority & Credibility Position your company as a thought leader through expert commentary, interviews, and special features.
MEDICAL FAIR ASIA 2026
MEDICAL FAIR CHINA

Latest stories

Related stories

Collective & Collaborative Care Coordination

The Challenge Higher Standards is a fast-growing home health group...

CHF Readmissions Are Reduced By RPM At MaineGeneral To 0%

MaineGeneral Health Augusta has high and rising relapse rates...

Subscribe

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from any location or device.

Media Packs

Expand Your Reach With Our Customized Solutions Empowering Your Campaigns To Maximize Your Reach & Drive Real Results!

โ€“ Access the Media Pack Now

โ€“ Book a Conference Call

โ€“ Leave Message for Us to Get Back

Translate ยป